ABDUL SATTAR versus THE STATE
Prohibition (Enforcement) Order 1979 Article Article 4 The police department's section on the definition of evidence was nested and its facts were not examined, nor was it exclusively the CIA Police Officer Sub Inspector of He was given the authority to investigate by the police. Therefore, it cannot be said that the matter was entrusted with the inquiry by a competent or in-charge police officer of the concerned police station, the CIA police could not conduct the investigation itself, especially when it suffered serious prejudice. It was The CIA police officer said that he had also worked as a complainant in the CIA, had made no attempt to secure the services of any independent witness and had been in his company at the relevant time. Was created to serve as a consultant to the immediate subordinates of. Case of Recovery of Heroin from the Accused Police Office: Under Section 156 (1), CCP was not barred from becoming a complainant when he was a witness. Such a police officer can be an Investigation Officer unless the person accused of the police station, HO, has not been subjected to any prejudice, nor has he been investigated nor prosecuted in the case. Created by an IA police officer. One person challenged the defendant in the trial and presented his subordinate as a mere witness, causing the defendant to suffer serious prejudice.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firms from Samundri lawyer