BISMILLAH KHAN versus THE STATE
Pakistan Penal Code Sections 396/34 and 397/34 Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VI 1979), Section 20 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Section 193 Trial Court's jurisdiction challenged. The challan was never presented to a magistrate for the purpose of admitting it and only on the recommendation of the district attorney, in the direct court session, because the exercise of jurisdiction meant that the magistrate's condition Sending a Trial Session to Court As required under Section 193 (1), the CC was not met; the Sessions Court is not capable of admitting this offense directly to the report submitted by the District Attorney and the action taken by the Sessions Court clearly. But in the illegal number was Section 6396, the accused under the PPC should be five or more and the number of accused in this case is only two, so they could not make the conclusions. Under section 6396, the convicts and the accused of PPC and the convictions of the accused were kept with the consent of the parties to the relevant Advocate General to ensure that the challan of the matter was forwarded to the magistrate. Who confessed to the crime. After doing the necessary work, he sends the court session to trial according to law
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firm from Pind Dadan Khan lawyer