RANA NAZIR versus UNITED BANK LIMITED
Specific Relief Act 1877 Section 52 and 54 Terms of Service and Terms of Service The date of birth of the plaintiff was wrongly entered in the record of the defendant; the trial court declared the case in favor of the plaintiff. And directed the permission to the plaintiff. The plaintiff will continue its service keeping in view the exact date of birth. The lower appellate court amended the order and dismissed the terms and conditions of service as valid so as to allow the plaintiff to continue the service until a certain date. , Section 22 & And, 54, was outside the jurisdiction of the Civil Court in view of the Specific Relief Act, 1877; there was no illegal motion by the lower appellate court to amend the trial court's order. ?
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Ludhan lawyer