Find a Lawyer

KHANUM JAN versus MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE

Punjab Tenancy Act 1887 Section 70 Punjab Land Reforms (Procedure for Withdrawal Suit) Rules, 1977, R6 Constitution Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition for Compensation for Tenants Compensation was removed from the land in dispute. Approval of the compensation, which was dismissed by the Tehsildar, and the order of the Board of Revenue Tenants remains that the Tehsildar rejected his request under section 70 of the Punjab Tenancy Act, 1887 and required under R6 of Punjab. Have not been investigated. Land Reforms (Procedure for Withdrawal Suit) Rules, 1977, and that applicants were not given any notice of their application being rejected and the Tehsildar's order of compliance with the Board of Revenue expired after sixty days. There was no jurisdiction in this matter. It was revealed that all the disputes raised by the applicants before the High Court were reviewed by the Tehsildar during the order Tina's approval. The NTS took advantage of the land for four decades without paying the landlord a penny, below. All the courts of the United States were justified in saying that they were not entitled to any compensation. Once the harmonious orders of the courts below are approved in accordance with the law, they cannot be interfered with. By the High Court with the exercise of constitutional jurisdiction criminal advocate from Allahabad lawyer