NISAR AHMED versus KOHISTAN GOODS FORWARDING AGENCY
Article 199 Law Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972), Decision of Section 3 Intra Court Appeal on Dispute Question, High Court Counsel Applicant With Disqualified Jurisdiction, High Court With Inequitable Hand Referred to Its High Court Both sides raised the controversial version before the High Court, but the High Court, without convincing the contentious question, instructed the authorities to give the respondent a contract because it was not in accordance. The law where the applicant had hidden the material facts and approached the High Court, the High Court erred in the law to seek arbitration in favor of the applicant.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
divorce advocates from Mailsi lawyer