Find a Lawyer

SAID MUHAMMAD versus PROVINCE OF THE PUNJAB

Empty Property and Homelessness Act (repealed) Act 1975 Section 2 Homelessness (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act (Section XXVIII of 1958), Section 10 Withdrawal of property, Controversial property auction was allotted to the applicant on 30 6 1960. And the respondents themselves, in favor of the permanent transfer agreement were also claimed that the auction of the 1/2 share of the suit property settlement authorities on the review request by the Allot kept the auction proceedings separate and The auction buyer attacked the notified officer's order in the civil suit and the trial court set it aside. The lower appellate court overturned the trial court's findings and restored the authenticity of the informed officer where the entire house was allotted to the allottee, and a permanent transfer deed passed by the notified officer. I have mentioned this. The whole house went out of the pool of compensation, so, the settlement authorities, in law, had no jurisdiction to distribute the property and no part of it was distributed by any competent officer to auction. And it was never treated as a separate unit of the lower lower appellate court. Sarah and some of her property was not available to be auctioned in the dispute, the auction was illegal and the lower appellate court decided to intervene. advocate for immigration from Rahwali lawyer