MUHAMMAD SIRDAR KHAN versus COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE AND LAND CUSTOMS, LAHORE
After conviction under section 156 (1) (89) of the Customs Act 1969 by the Special Court on the Interim Constitution Order (1 of 1981), Article 9 Constitution Petition, Section 179A & 156 (1) (89) of the Customs Act 1969 Has been charged. The Special Appellate Court dismissed the appeal and the matter was finalized, however, the accused was charged by the department with fines and maintaining the truck at the government level. The orders filed by the accused, which were applied by constitutional application, were in the field of custody application validity section 179A3 12 1978 of the Customs Act 1969 when the incident occurred and later canceled on 28 6 1979. The section was superseded by the decision of the Special Court or Special Appeal Court on the orders passed by the authorities in judicial proceedings on the decision of the Special Judge or Special Appellate Court. In the Lillett Court of Appeal or Revision, if any trial and trial of any crime was relevant, the application and cancellation of Section 179A of the Customs Act, therefore, did not matter. Without legal action, legal proceedings had no legal effect
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law websites from Doaaba lawyer