Find a Lawyer

AMJAD HUSSAIN AND 2 OTHERS versus THE STATE

Pakistan Penal Code Section 336/324 praised the evidence as well as its unidentified accomplices sustained sustained injuries to the rapist gunman on the left leg, after which he had to be amputated. While making regular statements. All collective points were supported by ocular testimony with medical evidence, and the evidence of the incident that occurred on the big day could not have resulted in a mistaken identity or question of replacing the accused. Was heard and consequently the victim's leg remained intact. However, it was not due to the accused and in order to save the life of the victim he needed to be performed because medical opinion was not possible to treat the injury. The accused was not the only person who opened fire. Was in the leg of the victim, but a similar injury was attributed to his unidentified co-accused and it was not possible to ascertain which of the two injuries caused by the injured person's leg must be amputated. According to the trial court's order, the accused's leg was, therefore, not only fair and reasonable, or else, it was not possible or practicable that the victim C fired with a repeater gun at the suspect's leg. It was not possible under the circumstances to execute the accused for the same type of injury, and he was set aside and instead the accused was sentenced to seven years in prison. Arsha was asked to attach half of the debt, amounting to Rs 1,06,332, in which he failed to remain in jail till such payment was made till the accused's appeal immigration advocate from Rahimyar Khan lawyer