SAADIA ABDUL QAIYUM versus JOINT ADMISSION COMMITTEE
Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 199 ??? Constitutional application ??? Educational institution ??? Admission to the BD section ??? Special quota seats ??? The candidate who was registered in PMDC and daughter of a Domiciled Doctor in N applied for other doctors in the category of seats? ??? The candidate was refused admission because he could not submit the General Practitioner Certificate. Instead, her father's admission was given to the respondents who fall into the category of children of the Department of Health doctors? Validation ??? The candidate was given different categories while admission was given in different categories? Where the two variants were separated. And separately for the free allocation of seats, the candidate's refusal to enter was illegal and wrong. ??? The High Court directed the authorities to admit the candidate to the BD section on the basis of his qualification. ??? Protect the interior through false pretenses or fraud or false advertising and there was no blame, rather, because the authorities interpreted different categories. The court recommends authorities regulate defendant's admissions so that his educational career and sessions are not lost.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate for immigration from Amangarh lawyer