ABDUL WADOOD versus THE STATE
West Pakistan Arms Ordinance 1965 Section 13 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), section 103 allegedly found under arms and ammunition coach seats, which was accompanied by the accused and nothing was recovered from the accused person. Was. There was nothing on the record to show that the accused had no knowledge of the arms and ammunition coach lying under the seats and nothing was on the record to show who kept the equipment and Even where he was brought to the coach, in the absence of any evidence, it cannot be said of the evidence that the accused had constructive possession of the recovered articles. The location was not deserted, but the area was deserted and night. The incident did not occur at the time of the incident, however, no private person was tried. All the witnesses of the prosecution were policemen from the general public and no reason was given for non-compliance with the provisions of section 103. Cannot be accepted and the accused is relied upon to punish. It is likely that the accused, being one of the coach's passengers, was entangled with a trivial motive; Refused, which gave him the benefit of the doubt
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Rawalpindi lawyer