The prosecution version of the Section 540 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34/109 Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 material witnesses was that the accused was arrested on 22 10 1997, while the defense The version was that he was, in fact, arrested on the night of 16/17 10 1997. Two such contradictory versions were not about a trivial or trivial matter, but were related to an extremely important and important evidence of eye witnesses, The cross-examination of the magistrate and the investigating officer was carried out as the date of arrest of the accused is shown in the newspaper which indicates that the accused has made his argument. Based tried to keep that according to her claim had been arrested and was remanded to appear as witnesses before the judicial closure, was a trial. The court accepted the plea of the accused under section 4040, CRPC, that plea would also appear on record and maintain the prosecution's position and defense as well. According to the law, the defendants were able to resolve the dispute and the convictions were set aside and the case was referred to the trial court, wherein the accused were referred to the witnesses in the petition filed under Section 540, CRPC. Was directed to seek. Record and review them as court witnesses and decide the case based on all the evidence available on record according to the law.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
