Find a Lawyer

CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY versus IZHAR AHMAD

Section 2A & 6 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 Reduction of proceedings The effect of the insertion of Section 2A in the Service Tribunals Act 1973 was decided before the Civil Court by the Civil Court before 10 1997 1997. Appeal was preferred before, but in appeal during the conviction, Section 2A was admitted to the Service Tribunals Act, 1973, consequently the appeal was dismissed because under the Services Tribunals Act 1973 sections 2A and 6. An appeal was filed, but the same was restricted by a government employee filing an execution request. The Authority filed objections to it and executed the same which the execution court declared invalid, allowing them to object and hang. Such an order of the Executive Court, along with the Appellate Court, also held that the High Court held that the continuance of the appeal was intact. The trial and appeal were dismissed by the process of law; the execution request was invalid as there was no execution order. "The validity only pending appeal was terminated and this decree passed before the target date, ie the decision of the Service Tribunals Act 1973 on 1997 and 1997, could not be rejected because of the inclusion of section 2A and the addition of section 2A. Unless it was either set aside or reversed by the High Court or declared invalid by the law, when it could not say that it had become ineffective, ineffective and unforgettable The registrar has acquired personal rights which cannot be redeemed because of postponement of the pending proceedings. famous supreme court advocate from Astore lawyer