Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

RAHMAT ALI versus MUHAMMAD AMIN


Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 417 of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), section 302/34 automatically appeals against a star witness who claims to have witnessed the incident, was not examined by the prosecution because Despite his detection, he could not be ascertained. The evidence of the complainant and other witnesses of the prosecution by the court was evidence worthy of hearing because they were informed by the main witness about the incident and the other witnesses' formality, it was not necessary to consider their evidence, The prosecution has failed to prove the offense against the accused. Reasonably, the defendant was properly acquitted by the trial court's decision by the trial court, appeal cannot be interfered with.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
tax advocates from Naudero lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.