MUHAMMAD ASLAM versus STATE
Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 497 Contempt Code (XLV of 1860), Section 9595 B / of 34 Guarantee, 16 days after the arrest of the accused's grant, he was subjected to an identity test and no explanation for the delay was forthcoming. Did not claim to come. The accused, however, did not play any role for the accused in the commission of the crime, alleging that for more than a year the trial court had expressed inadequacy in terminating the trial, leading to such an inevitable delayed prosecution. Was not submitted. The weakest evidence against the accused in the form of an identity parade, which was held even after an unusual delay, was entitled to guarantee the accused in the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
patent advocate from Dunyapur lawyer
