CH. SHAFAQAT AHMED versus INSPECTOR?GENERAL OF POLICE, PUNJAB, LAHORE
Police Rules 1934 R 13 18 Punjab Civil Servants Act (VII of 1974), Section 8 Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), Section 4 Promotion Based on the acts of bravery, confirmed the appointment / progress and performed best in front of the service tribunal. About nine years after the appointment of a public servant who joined the Appellate Police Department, who joined the department as a Division I, he was promoted to sub-inspector and was confirmed for two years. It was after a long period of inquiry, and later a public servant was promoted to inspector, and this was confirmed at a certified post. Done Two years after its development and finally after its development, he was promoted to Deputy Superintendent of Police, and it was long after he was confirmed by a civil servant that he claimed for his bravery and excellent performance. Due to the issue, its certification was required from a section I to be revised under the Punjab Police Rules, 8 13 18 of 1934 and it was entitled to be certified at all stages from the date of development or from the date of the G act. ? In the past, however, the representation of civil servants was rejected by the authorities, the government employee filed an appeal before the service tribunal of the civil servants, during which he was a civil servant of the Quaid-e-Azam Police Medal, several times with the highest award. Were. Bari was recommended for out-of-state development, which was valid under Section 8A of the Punjab Civil Servants Act, 1974, on account of his outstanding service record. The civil servant was not demanding development in return for his bravery or outstanding performance. He was, however, involved with the development of the position of Deputy Superintendent of Police
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
