Find a Lawyer

SH. JAVED SARWAR versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB

Punjab Government Employees (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules 1975 R4 Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), Section 4 Dismissal of Employment Termination The Government employee was dismissed from the job after being questioned on the charge that It violates its policy. The direction of the government and the commissioner was instrumental in the allotment of valuable plot belonging to the highway department, the charge against the civil servant was fully established and it has been established that what the civil servant has done Was not meant to be. The government officer, Kewal Khadim, failed to accuse the officer-in-charge of the inquiry officer, authorized officer, or public servant of any unreasonable will or personal difficulty, though it was beyond any doubt but the recovery of the case characterized the punishment. Were in the context of Government employees were given the relevant authorities who approved the allotment order in connection with the plot. In question, they were also held responsible by the inquiry officer, but no action was taken against any of them and the question is still pending. The plot was not delivered to the allottee, who had relinquished his rights to the allotment by the government employee who had extended his employment. For more than three decades and the action against him was a singular example, the dismissal of the job was changed to mandatory retirement, under the circumstances. best advocate from Village Sunder lawyer