MUHAMMAD ASLAM versus INSPECTOR?GENERAL OF POLICE, PUNJAB, LAHORE
Punjab Police (Talent and Discipline) Rules 1975 RR 7, 8 and 12 Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), Section 4 Misconduct Mandatory Retirement Government employee was dismissed on charges of corruption, but sentenced on appeal The dismissal of a two-year approved service authority, after issuing a showcase notice to a civil servant, exercised its jurisdiction over a period of approximately one year and five months. But without inquiry and without giving the civil servants a reasonable opportunity to defend themselves, the appellate authority's decree was fixed and the authority was honored under the R12 of the Punjab Police for immediate retirement from the service with immediate effect. And discipline) 1975, was to be used indirectly, discreetly and in a timely manner and not after a period of one year and five months, after a period of interrogation by the inquiry officer, In the event of the imposition of a large penalty that cannot be complied with by the authority, even if the amending power In the absence of a regular inquiry into use, the service of the showcase notice cannot fulfill the conclusion of justice when the very premise was illegal, only after it was constituted, it was bound to abolish the investigation. In the absence of prejudice, in the absence of prejudice, the government practicing revision practice with extraordinary delay, the order passed against it was set aside and ordered to be restored.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
