M. BADAR IQBAL versus SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL RESOURCES, ISLAMABAD
Civil Servants Act 1973 Section 5 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 respondents were appointed the heads of the department to persons belonging to completely different cadre in which the appellant was serving and said Was to fill in such a post to correct the post. Therefore, the defendant, belonging to a completely different cadre, could not claim himself to be senior to the appellant in the particular cadre in which he was appointed and in which the appellant was serving the appellant. Feelings were made when defendant was promoted to head of the department in violation of relevant laws. Therefore, due to the cause of action the respondent was questioned for appellant on the question of appointment of respondent and the position of the respondents in different cadres, their positions / posts could not be exchanged and the interests of the other employee. An employee's rights could not be stripped of. However, in order to facilitate the violation of the rules, a person belonging to one cadre may be temporarily assigned to another, but this will not give him any rights over those already working. The department rules are not allowed to import officers from other sections, even if there is some violation of the rules in the appointments, such an error is eliminated. Or any other infringement cannot be cited as the judicial forums could not allow the violation of rules / regulations. Respondent Corporation employees are considered to perform duties in connection with the affairs of the Federation, therefore, they are
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
