Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASHRAF versus PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION CORPORATION

Sections 8 and 12 (a) of the Civil Servants Act 1973 Federal Public Service Commission (Functions) Rules, 1978, showed that 4 civilian government employees were employed as elders to oppose public servants, but later Nearly ten years after the list listed on the seniority list issued, he retired to take the senior position, public servants claiming he seniority joined the service on a regular Federal Federal Service Commission recommendation. While government employees joined the department on an ad hoc basis under the NDVP program and government employees After regular appointments, his services were made regular. Government employees opposed that he was a graduate engineer, and while he was undergoing job training, the Federal Public Service Commission advertised the positions of assistant divisional engineers and since he was already employed as an assistant divisional engineer. Were. , He represented the Prime Minister to give the tenth number as Assistant Divisional Engineers to the Prime Minister, as the authorized authority to oppose the government employees and accordingly they were appointed as opposed to the government employees. I issued the Federal Public Service Commission Rules 1978 and according to R4, the Federal Public Service Commission was instructed to examine appointed public servants between 1 1972 and 30 6 1977 The cases were wanted by the President of Pakistan to the Federal Public Service Commission as to whether or not he held the post. During which they were living near him. During this period, face the appointment of a public servant top civil advocates from Mithi lawyer