Find a Lawyer

CITIBANK N.A. versus JUDGE, BANKING COURT-IV

Section 42 Canaanite Evidence of Banking Companies (Debt, Progress, Credit and Recovery of Financial Resources) Act, 1997 (Article 10 (1984)), Article 85 (5) Suit for Plaintiffs who were the Cousins of the Plaintiff and Fake and its basis But his land was cultivating. The sale agreement in favor of the plaintiff in exchange for a settlement with another defendant and the power of attorney, in the absence of the claimant in the possession of the plaintiff in exchange for the plaintiff in favor of the plaintiff and other The power of attorney was denied in favor. The trial court heard that the defendant and the statement sought that the documents be declared illegal and invalid and that the plaintiff was the owner of the land in the dispute and did not sell the land to the defendants. But on appeal, the appellate court dismissed the case by the lawyer, the plaintiff's land was changed to the name of the defendant and refused to be processed, it was not presented on the record. No explanation for the omission was given by the defendants. Defendants claimed that the power of attorney to be registered is a public document and that the certified copy of the evidence is admissible, because the dispute was dismissed as Article 85 (5) of Article 85 of the Law, only in 1984 ) Can be a document registered as a public document, the execution of which was not disputed, while the plaintiff was led by the defendants to prove the authority of the official court can not be justified. After the mutation, its holding was not valid top advocates from Dhirkot lawyer