LATIF AHMAD versus JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SHUJABAD, DISTRICT MULTAN
Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Sections 157, 158, 159 and 167 Prohibition (Enforcement Hadith) Order (4 of 1979), Article 3/4 Control of Narcotic Substances (XXV of 1997), Section 9 (C) of the Constitution Pakistan (1973), Article 199 The exclusion of the accused in a criminal case does not mean that the acquittal of an accused in a criminal case does not mean that the prosecution had been prosecuted or not. In the event of an end, it is only to keep the accused in custody. The accused and his acquittal were only from his bond, which would mean that the accused no longer needs to be detained in this case for interrogation purposes and such accused will not be required to bail out. / There is administrative process and the question that was ultimately related to the matter in which the court was to be stopped was the issue of order by the magistrate to be challenged by the state before the High Court and not the police officer. By arresting. The discharged accused used can still be summoned to trial by the trial court if he had enough material available to justify the proceedings, which would have been worth hearing through a case off session. The magistrate had full authority to exclude the accused
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
