Find a Lawyer

GHULAM MUHAMMAD versus NOOR MUHAMMAD

The trial court ruled that the case for the specific performance of the contract, sections 12, 14, 15 and 17 of the Special Relief Act 1877, was ruled by the trial court in the case that the plaintiff sold the plaintiff in his favor. Implementation of the Agreement and the payment of certain payments thereby. In filing this, but upon appeal, the judgment and decree passed by the trial court were fixed by the appellate court on the ground that the defendant had not obtained proprietary rights in respect of the dispute filed by the plaintiff. Under the circumstances, the appellate court below was not reversed. Presenting the trial and contract testimony in the trial, the plaintiff sought the trial court's address on the execution of the contract of sale and the payment of part thereof in the name of the defendant for the sale of the land value. The testimony of the bank records relating to the issued checks, the execution of a valid sale agreement and the payment of the price for the minor contradictions can be ignored, in fact, in the context of the transaction referred to after twenty-five years. Was prepared to testify, the defendant, who was cross-examined by the defendant, The statement was steadfast and failed to prove, together with the plaintiff and defendant, that it could not comply with the terms of the plaintiff. Under the agreement, the appellate court, in the circumstances, rendered the judgment unreasonable, following the trial court's decision and decree. law firms from Wan Radha Ram lawyer