Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD HANIF versus MUHAMMAD ASLAM KHAP

Section 3 (5) of the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), the second appeal of the Section 100 Second Appeal License suit, was filed on the ground that the suit property was alienated on the ground that the appellant was insane and on behalf of the appellant in any way The transaction was canceled. When the lower appellate court, like the case, rejected the court, the appellant was not insane and the appellant's guardian was appointed, he was disappeared under the provisions of the Lunacy Act 1912, where the appellant as a witness presented himself in the trial court. Alas, the lower appellate court's decision was not open to interference registration advocate from Dhirkot lawyer