Find a Lawyer

ZAHID RASOOL versus MUHAMMAD NAJEEB

In contempt of court 3/4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 204 of the contempt of court Act 1976, the contempt of court High Court directed the respondent to return the applicants to the possession of the property at the specified time, which the defendant occupied. Ali took over. Forcibly, with the help of legal workers, the respondents did not intentionally comply with the order but despite no ambiguity in the order, the respondent took the court's order so lightly that it even responded to the contempt of court petition. Did not The court's respondents subsequently submitted an answer and did not seek an apology, and it was submitted only in the amended reply that the defendant sought an unconditional apology which was similar to admitting the charge against him. The respondents were not sincere in apologizing as was to be presented in the initial phase of contempt of court proceedings, but the defendant postponed the end of the proceedings ngs Respondent, in the circumstances, was guilty of committing contempt of court respondent. Was sentenced and sentenced accordingly top civil advocates from Sidhnoti lawyer