Find a Lawyer

KALU KHAN versus ABDUL AZIZ

The plaintiff sued the plaintiff for a declaration case claiming that he is the owner of the suit property, the suit was dismissed by the trial court, but the appellate court ruled that the defendants were legally entitled to the sale. The property was transferred in the name of the replacement property. Consider who stepped in their shoes to own it. Defendants' behavior shows that they had alleged misconduct with the plaintiff, that the vendor was never challenged in favor of the plaintiff that he had no option of transferring the property and could do so. The appellate court upheld the transfer of other property owned by the plaintiff to fulfill the claim of the plaintiff, which is in accordance with the law and did not guarantee fairness and the intervention was denied. ?

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013

• Mst. MEHR AFZOON v. AURANGZEB 2013 YLR 2380
• NAWAZ KHAN v. KALEEM KHAN 2013 YLR 2395
• QEMAT BAHA v. GOVENRMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA 2013 YLR 2403
• SARDAR AHMAD v. Mst. ZEENAT BIBI 2013 YLR 2439
• MANZOOR HUSSAIN v. ABDUR RASHEED KHAN 2013 YLR 2488
• Dr. ROIDAD SHAH v. M. ZAHOOR 2013 YLR 2517
• Mst. NAGEENA v. State 2013 YLR 2522
• Mian SAEEDULLAH JAN v. Mst. NUSRAT BEGUM 2013 YLR 2553

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2013 →

advocates from Ludhan lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes