Sections 42, 39 and 12 of the Transfer Property Act (IV of 1882), 54 Registration Act (XVI of 1908), declaration of section 17 sale agreement and non-registration of contract to sell certain performance (plaintiff (husband)) The effect was related. That he had purchased the disputed plot and that the plaintiff (wife) had filed a claim for the specific performance of the contract, on the basis of which the mutation was affirmed, both the suit was consolidated and the plaintiff's suit dismissed simultaneously. Under which the plaintiff's wife was also acquitted. Trial court but appeal was not filed. No appeal / review was filed by the plaintiff and the trial court's findings / agreement were finalized in connection with the trial for the specific performance of the cabinet, the collection of the Dover amount and the dissolution of the marriage. Subsequently, the plaintiff's woman further agreed that the plaintiff's claimant's wife's wife was satisfied that the beneficiaries were not honored as the cabinet was unregistered. The defendant admitted that the plaintiff had purchased the plot. And turned it in his favor. The fact that Lukar was hanged was mentioned in the name Naka, which was not a dispute, the marriage was dissolved and the defendant was not entitled to take advantage of an agreement which was not a part and the parcel of the Dover money was disputed. Should be returned at a price which is related to the landed property of more than one hundred rupees and was registered under section 17 of the Registration Act, 1908, the contract was not registered, therefore, there was no right to review the respondent's wife. Accepted and his case dismissed
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013
