Find a Lawyer

MIAN SAEEDULLAH JAN versus MST. NUSRAT BEGUM

O. XVII, R 3 Failure to present evidence provided sufficient opportunities to exclude the plaintiff and the last repeated opportunity to produce evidence, but he failed to present the same. The plaintiff's evidence was dismissed and the case dismissed The court could not compel the defendants to present their evidence, rather it was their duty to present their claim only when the court realized it. That the plaintiffs are not interested in presenting their evidence, then they had no choice but to pass the trial court's order to dismiss their evidence. Aqabl the concept and the application has been deleted

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013

• KALU KHAN v. ABDUL AZIZ 2013 YLR 2481
• MANZOOR HUSSAIN v. ABDUR RASHEED KHAN 2013 YLR 2488
• Dr. ROIDAD SHAH v. M. ZAHOOR 2013 YLR 2517
• Mst. NAGEENA v. State 2013 YLR 2522
• GHULAM HUSSAIN v. SONA KHAN 2013 YLR 2566
• ABDUL RASHID v. Mst. SHAHIDA PARVEEN 2013 YLR 2616
• MUHAMMAD ASGHAR v. GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN 2013 YLR 2639
• RAHIM SHAHID v. State 2013 YLR 2642

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2013 →

patent advocate from Rahwali lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes