Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ANWAR versus THE STATE

Pakistan Penal Code Sections 302, 105 and 106 Review of Evidence Right to Defense, On the basis of the request for approval of the overall appeal, the accused pleaded during the inquiry that the trial court, based on such request, sentenced the accused to death. The suspect did not prove the cause of the crime. Such pleas were made during the trial, but the accomplices were acquitted because the trial court denied the ocular account of the prosecution witnesses to their extent. In the appeal, the High Court denied the supporting evidence. Justification where the High Court denied the supporting evidence, the prosecution was dismissed on the ocular statement of both witnesses and could not be relied upon for the safe administration of justice unless there was a seriousness of the petition. Did not accept. With regard to the suspect he made in his statement under Section 342, CR PC, Etirl was available on record to measure the grip of a risk-averse property suspect as well as the person who killed him on the murder. By agreeing to the contempt of court plea that he had agreed to fire, the accused, who himself did not suffer any injury. Neither the corpse nor any weapon was found near the dead body, nor with the possession of the deceased's accomplices, did the accused create a strong state of control in his favor, leading to the death penalty. Was not entitled Section 302, the PPC was upheld and the death sentence was changed to life imprisonment ask a advocate free from Chaman lawyer