Find a Lawyer

DR. TARIQ NAWAZ versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN

Medical Officers (Regulatory Appointments) Act 1992 and Section 3 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 18 and Strengthening of Medical Officers Act (Regulation of Appointments) Act 1992, Discrimination, ad hoc appointment of doctors. 12 10 Before 1988, section 3 was regularized under the provisions of the Medical Officers (Regulatory Appointments) Act, 1992, the appointment of the applicants on ad hoc basis, from 1992 to 1992, after the date fixed in Section 3 of the Medical Officers. The (Regular) Act, 1992, the Act, 1992, was not regulated by the petitioners that the law was discriminatory in nature and violated Articles 18 and 25 of the Constitution which year. Strength was appointed in 1989 and thus he could not do so. Take advantage of the benefits contained in Section 3 of the Medical Officers (Regulatory Appointments) Act 1992 because such discrimination cannot be equated which always involves the element of inappropriate prejudice and in this case the provisions of the Medical Officers. Lack of (Regulatory Appointments) Act, 1992, was neither arbitrary nor discriminatory nor was it a breach of the provisions of the treaty as directed in Articles 18 and 25 of the Constitution. immigration advocates phone number from Dinga lawyer