Find a Lawyer

SALEEM AHMAD versus AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR GOVERNMENT

Azad Jammu and Kashmir Civil Servants (Appointment and Regulations of Services) Regulations 1977 Rr 10 A & 10b J&K Minerals and Industrial Development Corporation Service Rules, 1974, Rr 5 and 24 Jurisdiction for Writing Promotional Intelligence, Appellants The senior, who was senior in use, was neglected for development and despite being a junior with the appellants, the respondent was promoted by his chairman as the secretary of the corporation, whose chairman was appellant / applicant. In the writ petition, he was challenged before the High Court on which he was the first senior. Right to development and second, that the order of development can only be approved by the corporation's board of directors, not its chairman and third, that of Azad Jammu and Kashmir, appointment of government employees and service rules, 1977. Applicable to the parties, the development can only be ordered under R 10A of the above rules on an operating charge / offsetting basis, but this was not deemed that the appellant's sanity was not disputed by the defendants. The petition filed by the High Court was rejected by the High Court denying that the Chairman, who has the officers' Have the option to exchange, he or she may legally order the promotion with the approval of the Board of Directors. The Corporation High Court also found that in accordance with R24 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Minerals and Industrial Development Corporation Service Rules 1974, the same rules apply to the employees of the corporation in relation to their appointments, promotions, etc. Shall be considered a public servant and in this case no judgment of the High Court immigration advocate from Sagri lawyer