Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

UMAR KHAN versus NAWAB MUHAMMAD FARID KHAN ETC


West Pakistan Land Reform Regulation 1959 West Pakistan Land Reform Regulation, 1959, paras 4 (3), 7 and 19 does not entitle any tenant to question the right, otherwise, by means of gift land or otherwise. That the land held by it has not been resumed under paragraph 19.

P L D 1966 W. P. (Rev.) 50

Before I. U. Khan, Chief Land Commissioner, West Pakistan

UMAR KHAN‑Petitioner

versus

Nawab MUHAMMAD FARID KHAN ETC----Respondents

Revision No. 1066 of 1962, decided on 10th September 1962.

West Pakistan Land Reforms Regulation, 1959,

paras. 4(3), 7 & 19 ‑ Gifts of land validated by competent authority‑No tenant has right to question validity or otherwise unless land in his possession was resumed under para. 19.

Petitioner in person.

Mahmood Ali Qasuri and Saeed‑ur‑Rahman for Respondents.

ORDER

This is a revision filed against an order, dated the 18th of April 1961, passed by the Land Commissioner, Peshawar, whereby he validated the gifts made by Nawab Sir Muhammad Farid Khan in favour of his sister, wife, daughter‑in‑law and his son. The petitioner is alleged to be a tenant of a portion of the land. The question as to whether any alienation is valid or not is exclusively the concern of the donor, the donee and the State. No tenant has any right to question the validity or otherwise of a gift which has been validated by a competent authority. A right accrues to a tenant only when the land in his possession has been resumed under Martial Law Regulation No. 64 and the provisions of paragraph 19 thereof have become applicable. Before that, stage is reached, no tenant has any right to come up to any Land Commission authority for making any request. In this case, the land has not been resumed. No action under paragraph 19 can be taken. Therefore, no right accrues to the tenant.

2. Moreover, the revision is also time‑barred and, under the existing instructions of the Land Commission, the delay cannot be condoned. In these circumstances, the petition is dismissed.

S. Q. Petition dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
lawer from fb area from Panjan Kisan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.