Lawyers Directory Listing
Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.
Review No. 441 of 1961‑62, decided on 31st July 1962.
, para. 4(3) Predecessor Chief Land Commissioner, through oversight, in his order advising petitioner to get revenue records corrected through a "competent Court of law"‑Correction of order substituting "competent Revenue Authorities" for "competent Court of law" allowed in review.
Wahid Bakhsh, Mukhtar for Petitioner.
M. Allah Bakhsh Patwari, Chak Bhakkar and Amir Muhammad Patwari, Circle Mutfany Chahan for Respondent.
1. This is a review against an order, dated the 10th of July 1961 passed by my predecessor whereby he agreed with the views of the Land Commissioner, Bahawalpur but it was left open to the petitioner to get the revenue records corrected through a competent Court of law relating to six acres in dispute and then approach the Land Commission authorities, if necessary.
2. The facts of the case are given in the order mentioned above. It has been urged before me that action to get the revenue records corrected is not possible because, by an oversight, my learned predecessor, used the words "Competent Court of Law". Actually, the corrections are 'to be made by the Competent Revenue Authorities. It has been prayed that the order passed by my learned predecessor be amended accordingly. This is a reasonable request and I, therefore, accept the review and direct that in para. 5 of my learned predecessor's order dated the 10th of July 1961, the words "Competent Court of law" shall be replaced by the words "Competent Revenue Authorities".
S. Q. Petition accepted.
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer