BASHIR AHMAD versus THE STATE
Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 497 (2) Contempt Code (XLV of 1860), Section 457/380/392 The accused was not named in the FIR for the first time in his supplementary statement after the complaint The accused was involved in the case. Twenty months after the incident, the identity parade was not held so that the accused could be identified positively and linked to the crime so that during the interrogation he had stolen Rs. 1,200 in cash from the accused. It was not linked to the property. The accused was jailed for the past four months and his physical custody in prison could not serve any purpose. Further investigation of his crime was sought in the jurisdiction of Section 497 (2), CR PC against the accused. The accused was allowed to bail in the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
family advocate from Haroonabad lawyer
