MUHAMMAD TARIQ versus SUPERINTENDENT, NEW CENTFAL JAIL, BAHAWALPUR
The Pakistan Penal Code section 394 was denied by the government to extend the benefits of a public amnesty to the inmates' exemption, because their case was a robbery that was explicitly intended for the purpose of amnesty. Was excluded from The accused were never convicted of the crime of robbery and in fact were convicted under Section 394, PPC, which is meant to voluntarily suffer the crime of robbery. The serious crime of robbery was removed by the government for the purpose of pardoning the crime, but the crime of robbery was not taken into account and the benefit of the said pardon was increased.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates phone number from Skardu lawyer
