MUHAMMAD ALI versus CHIEF LAND COMNUSSIONER
Punjab Land Reforms Rules 1972 R 13 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Section 5 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Application Motion, Cancellation, Delayed Delay, Confirmation of Controversial Change Before Chief Land Commissioner Assistant Collector Grade Was made by 11, on the basis of a court-approved decree of competent jurisdiction, the respondent changed the jurisdiction of the amended jurisdiction to the Chief Land Commissioner and it was revoked, amended under R13 of Punjab Land Reform Rules 1972 The accuracy option was available to the Chief. Where the order was issued under a challenge to the Land Commissioner or the automobile at the request of the affected person, it was approved by the Land Commissioner, Deputy Land Commissioner or Legal Adviser where the Authority exercises the jurisdiction to amend the request of the aggrieved person. The same cannot be said about the use. No order was passed by any such authorities. The revocation order was not approved by the Chiefland Commissioner for the use of automotive power, and the review filed by the respondents was periodically banned and the Chiefland Commissioner delayed the revision. There was no authorization under section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1908. The circumstance, which was responsible for the rejection, was an order passed by the Chiefland Commissioner, therefore, illegal, invalid, and without legal authority.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from Ludhan lawyer