Find a Lawyer

TAJBARO versus MUHAMMAD ASHRAF JADOON

Legal Practitioners and Bar Councils Act 1973 Section 41 Legal Practitioners and Bar Councils Rules 1976, RR 134, 172 and 175 A professional misconduct was charged by the son of a lawyer in a murder case under which the victim An agreement was reached between the complainant and the legal representative. Defendant's legal representatives agree to receive the money, Advocate's complaint against the Advocate alleges that the Complainant sold his only house to pay the money to the Legal Representative of the Subject, and said that the Advocate overcame the Complainant. Went and asked him to keep the sale deal with him as a trustee. Being an old woman, she could not secure large sums of money and it was feared that the complainant would be stripped of money by a complainant who alleged that the Advocate had to The money was handed over to the witnesses who is still available to the Advocate and he refused to return the money to one plea or other plea on his request. The Advocate's point was that he had received the said amount. Because the defense lawyer for the son of the evidence on record has proven that the complainant sold his house and the property was sold The lawyer was relied upon as an advocate after which he refused to pay. The statement of the complainant and his witnesses before the Tribunal about the oath was completely controversial = very high in the advocate community. And he should treat himself in such a way so that his client knows about his client. law firms from Kot Mithan lawyer