Find a Lawyer

WAJID ALI versus ZAFAR KHALIL, ADVOCATE

Pakistan Legal Practitioners & Bar Councils Rules 1976 Rr 134, 172 and 175 were against a professional misconduct allegation that they had received a large sum of money from the complainant by promising to go to the presiding officer from court. 'S son will be released. On bail and in the event of a failure, the complainant will return the money. Advocates did not rule out the allegations leveled against them, but merely stated that they had returned some money to the complainant, the Advocate Prime Faculty. The conduct of a lawyer was inappropriate and withdrawal. In terms of money, they will not forgive them of corruption. Advocates were obliged to maintain the dignity and superiority of the legal profession and to retain their dignity as a member of the legal community both inside and outside the court, and should refrain from involvement in fraud. Cheating with the confidence of the public in the Supreme Courts has shown great reliance and trust in the lawyers and any violation of it. It is certainly a matter of professional misconduct under the 8 175A of Pakistan Legal Practitioners and Bar Councils Rules 1976. , Who was found guilty of professional misconduct, was suspended from practice for a period of three years, with costs divorce advocates from Nankana Sahib lawyer