Find a Lawyer

IRSHAD KHAN versus GOHAR RAHMAN KHATTAK, ADVOCATE

Pakistan Legal Practitioners and Bar Councils Rules 1976 Rr 134, 172 and 175 Professional misconduct evidence proved on record that the Advocate had received a large sum of money from the Complainant / Client with the promise of payment, such as the Advocate's conduct. The presiding officer of the court was asked to acquit the complainant. , Was violating all guns of professional ethics and advocating for ethics was bound to uphold the dignity and dignity of the legal profession, as well as being a member of the legal community both inside and outside the courtroom. Maintain your dignity and refrain from getting involved. Cheating and defrauding the public's trust in the Supreme Courts has created a lot of trust and trust in lawyers and any violation of it will lead to professional misconduct under the 8 175A of Pakistan Legal Practitioners and Bar Councils Rules 1976, Advocate Occupational misconduct was found. Suspended from practice for a period of two years with costs incurred law firms from Buchay Key lawyer