Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

BAGH HUSSAIN versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, MIRPUR


Mirpur Municipal Committee Regulation for Development and Exploit for Plots or State 1985 Regulation 16 AJA and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974), Sections 42 and 44 of the 1974 Appellant for the Appellant for the plot over the allotted plot. In making, it claimed that the alleged violations could be regulated under Rule 16 of the Mirpur Municipal Committee (Regulation for Development and Disposal for Plots / State), Rule 16 came into force in 1985 while the allotment in favor of the respondents in 1974. Was made, Rule 16 did not apply to the appellant's case, he would respond to the same Rule 16 The right given allotment canceling effect will not be able to depend on when the Regulation was declared unconstitutional by the High Court of the question, especially when it stated was whether this 16 constitutional law. The High Court had a question of academic interest and could not enter the Supreme Court.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
law firms from Talamba lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.