ZAHID HUSSAIN MIRZA versus THE STATE
Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 242 of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), Section 295A / 295C / 298A / 506 The validity of the defendant's statement on the date set forth for this purpose had given a clear impression that The written request was accepted by the accused and that the recording of his statement under section 242 was postponed by the CCP until after he had alleged in the Supreme Court his decision to review the next. No one was ready to comment on the date. When the Sessions Court was surprised to record his statement, the case was not even set to record the accused's statement in that date when it was actually filed, then the proceeding on the said date in recording the accused's statement was separated. Was done. In the circumstances and the Sessions Court was instructed to record its statement on the date fixed for this purpose
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
when you need a advocate from Panjgur lawyer
