Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD YOUSAF versus FAZAL DAD

Azad Jammu and Kashmir Right of Predatory Act Act 1993 Section I4 Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974), Section 42, by the registration of the sale deed in respect of the property filed in the Supreme Court suit relating to the former constitution limitation. Seven months later, the seller objected to the claim that after the amendment to the relevant law, which had previously been reduced to four months for the enforcement of the right to copyright, the defendant filed a timely trial. The ban was imposed, stating that the plaintiff's request for this limitation period was denied. In the four months provided by the amended law, it was not attracted to the matter because the sale was carried out before the amendments to the relevant law because the plaintiff's confession was declared invalid because of the amendment. The four-month limit provided will govern whether the sale process was implemented. A period of four months is provided before or after the amendment, or any part thereof expires and can be used to file a case where the entire four-month period for the institution suit has expired or In the event that there is no reasonable time left for the establishment of a suit, no amended law will govern the case, when the relevant law is amended, 120 days from the time the plaintiff is required to file a lawsuit. There were still 119 days left for the plaintiff and the plaintiff had established the suit substantially after the expiry of the 119-day period, the suit could be considered stable when Devices are being banned. us immigration advocates from Killa Saifullah lawyer