Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AFZAL versus THE STATE

Pakistan Penal Code Section 2302/34/3 ????? Testimony of evidence was reported to the police about two-and-a-half hours after the incident, despite the fact that the police station was contrary to the FIR at the scene. It was also proved that after the discussion was registered and the witnesses presented by the prosecution were related to the deceased and the complainant and one witness who was the complainant's brother was a retired captain and the secretary was the secretary. Which may have prevailed on the local administration's version of the incident. The prosecution's version of the prosecution by the accused was even more mysterious and credible as given in the FIR, which shows that the co-accused, who arrived on the scene, fired his rifle with 222 and then The suspect fired his pistol which struck his stomach. Killed, but no vacancy was recovered on the spot, although it has come on the record that 4/5 shots were fired, no co-operation can be reached by e-trial court. The alleged recovery was tried and the trial court convicted the accused and acquitted the accused with the benefit of their suspicion, and the conspiracy against the accused was not proved. The co-accused was also acquitted of the charge for the benefit of the doubt immigration advocates contact from Kotli lawyer