Find a Lawyer

MAMAND versus BASHIR AHMAD

The suit was dismissed by the Assistant Collector for eviction against the Punjab Tenancy Act 1887 section 39 West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), Sections 161 and 164, which stated that between the parties the landlord and The tenant relationship was not available The collector rejected the order. The assistant collector concluded that the landlord and tenant relationship existed between the parties and the appeal against the judgment and the collector's order was rejected by the commissioner and the tenants filed a review against the commissioner's decision. And on the basis of the Commissioner's Validity Commissioner's order, the appeal was decided that the tenants were. No opportunity to earn = Absence of tenant advice can be no basis for punishing tenants. Commissioner tenants should have been present on appeal and argued for their decision on each of the points included in the appeal. Should have been given, but the Commissioner did not advertise on the principle of Appeal The Tourist Justice demanded that the appellants be given a suitable opportunity to present their view, the Commissioner's defective order was fixed. Receiving a case remand for a fresh decision in accordance with the law, keeping the requests immigration advocate from Ghotki lawyer