The Collector of the jurisdiction of the Collector of Additional Sections 4, 8, 9, 45 and 164 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act 1967 had changed the entry in the journal Waketti and retained the order of the Additional Commissioner, Additional Commissioner. Was placed The review was challenged on the ground that, under the directions of the Board of Revenue, the Additional Commissioner was not able to hear the appeal against the Collector's order and it was a bad administration approved by the Additional Commissioner, which was retained by the Additional Commissioner, The one who fulfilled the requirement of the law could not be called justice and justice because of the instructions given by the Board of Revenue in this regard that the cases against the Collector's order were being heard by the Commissioner himself. The Commissioner should, under the law, be praised by the Additional Commissioner in the absence of any illegal or infirmity. Was included The order of the Additional Commissioner stated that the order could not be called merely because the orders or executive directives of the Board of Revenue were not complied with.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
