Find a Lawyer

HAMID ALI KHAN versus MUHAMMAD ANWAR

Code of Conduct 1908, Section 115 and O IX, R 13 of the Punjab Pre-Impression Act (IX of 1991), Section 6, the suit for the preceding injunction, set aside the suit and the defendant in the absence of the present order, under O The petition IX, R 13, CPC, was filed by the defendant to issue the former party decree that it was not properly served as the plaintiff, who had obtained the defendant's collusion with the processor server. Gave false address, obtained false report and marked fake and forged signatures and committed fraud in court trial court, after recording evidence of the parties, ex. The petition for separation of writ was dismissed, but the appellate court rejected the trial court's order and remanded the case after rejecting the trial court's previous parties' decision and order. The server's justification for the service of summons on the plaintiffs did not inspire confidence and his statement did not prove that the defendant was serving properly. d The appellate court correctly denied the server for the right reasons, and the appellate court's decision could not interfere with the law, and all efforts should be made to resolve the dispute that was brought to court on the merit so that the parties. Instead of knocking down, matters should be decided. Technical basis attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Patika lawyer