Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASHRAF versus STATE

Pakistan Panel Code Section 2302/8 308 The testimony of witnesses at the scene of the testimony was highly suspicious, contradicting the weapon of the crime being brought by the evidence filed, the post-mortem report proving hostility between the accused and the prosecution witness. Happened. Since there was a dispute over the money the witness received for the business, the statement of the prosecution's witness in connection with the allegedly used gun recovery contradicted the investigation officer's statement that there was a clear discrimination. In view of this, evidence of such recovery was responsible. On the day of the incident, the story of recording the complainant's subpoena, which was also fraught with the complainant's statement, was of no value. The prosecution's evidence was completely untrue and the witness in the criminal administration of justice As such, it would be dangerous to follow a testimony. From the beginning of the accused-to-final-defense version, the position appeared appropriate, especially given the state of mind of the accused, as indicated by the defendant's statement, as well as the medical evidence of the complainant suggesting that it was closed. Range shot that he was mainly blowing. Bones, which was a feature of a suicide wound, was found guilty and sentenced, after which he took advantage of the suspect and the accused was acquitted. inheritance advocates near Khanqah Dogran lawyer