Find a Lawyer

ISTIKHAR ALI versus AURANG ZEB

Initially, the role of ineffective firing was initially attributed to the three suspects, but in the later part of the FIR, section 497 (5) and 498 bail of the Criminal Procedure Code (CCPC). One of the co-accused was accused of throwing a hand grenade. The injuries to the complainant were on a part of his body that could not be drunk by himself. A small grenade was found from the grenade blast and silencers were recovered from the spot. The role of the co-accused was different from the other two. Alibi's capture was verbal by the three suspects and there was no definite opinion by the police that the parties' relations were strained by the accused's innocence, with the case of a co-accused accused of throwing hand grenades. What was done was different from the other. The two accused trial courts had exercised discretion in guaranteeing the remaining two defendants in the circumstances but made the mistake of leaving the co-accused together. The order to grant bail was sustained before the arrest of the two accused involved in the bail, but the order of the accused who was accused of throwing a hand grenade was canceled, lawer from fb area from Farooqabad lawyer