Find a Lawyer

YOUSAF versus STATE

The testimony of the prosecution witnesses has fully supported the complainant's version, as defined in the FIR, as the prosecution witnesses agreed on a key aspect of the case. Were the ones who dismissed the incident with them. His own eyes were subjected to a lengthy investigation, but no material witnesses could be brought to the record by the accused, the prosecution's witnesses were independent and the accused could not prove that the complainant belonged to the defendant. Even if it was believed that the complainant belonged to the complainant, the mere relationship was not enough to destroy his testimony when the accused was not on record to prove anything to the accused FIR. There was no intent to commit fraud in the instant registration, the accused argues Was filed after And there were material contradictions, the recording of the said FIR was abolished, the trial showed the appearance of blood-stained ground, broken teeth of bodies, empty shells of 12 bore pellets and pellets extracted from a dead body. Recovery helped completely. In his post-mortem inspection, the 12-bore shotgun and the delay in sending the gun, the firefighter could not have been asked to refute his stated value, and medical evidence also confirmed the prosecution's case. Was. Beyond any doubt, the accused's conviction was upheld, but the trial court sentenced the accused to death and resulted in life imprisonment for reducing the circumstances. top advocates from Kakul lawyer