Find a Lawyer

GHULAM RABBABI versus THE STATE

Suppressing Terrorism Activities (Special Court) Act 1975 Section 302/337A (i) / 148/149 Definition of evidence found no cause for reduction in conviction, which left complainants and witnesses with injuries on their own persons. They will change a person. The case of a single firearm for a real offender, especially when there is no blood jihad or such gravity rivalry between the prosecution witnesses and the accused, can be excluded on the occasion by the prosecution's witnesses. Nor is this the case where counseling can be expected. Involvement of strangers Although it was alleged that two, two vacant parts of Kalashnikov were recovered on the spot, but since no recovery memo was prepared, the restoration also supported the prosecution's story in this case. Cannot be taken The witnesses were consistent on material points and they agreed on the incident, the suspect's involvement and the role they were assigned. The medical evidence of the above witnesses was endorsed, so that there was no recovery of blood-stained land from which it could be explained, there would be no denying that all the evidence would have led to this incident. The place was not where the alleged witnesses were present. This cannot be ruled out as most of them contained traces of wounds on the body, while there was no blood dispute between the prosecution's witnesses and the accused, prompting them to change the suspect for the original offender. can do. Sentenced, but given the mitigating circumstances, the trial court found the accused to be hanged 5 2 382 B, under CCP. famous lower court advocate from Haveli Lakha lawyer