SAEED AHMAD versus THE STATE
The accuser of appreciating the evidence of the Pakistan Penal Code Sections 302/34 and 324/34, who was declared a fatal injury to the victim, was a convict. It looks like one of the suspects was falsely implicated. The third suspect escaped after the father of the original suspect in the case, who was a practicing lawyer and was also closely related to the other co-accused, was allegedly armed with a pistol, but did not use the same. And the story presented also narrated. His prosecution was unnecessary and impossible for the prosecution's witness to hurt the witness after snatching a rifle from another accused, which the prosecutor allegedly tried to prevent from pursuing the case in this case. I'm striped. The motive set forth by the relevant co-accused prosecution was neither corrupt nor believed that the prosecution's story was false as it was recovered from the premises of a convicted felon.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
patent advocate from Ukba lawyer
